top of page
Search

Today in Supreme Court History: August 9

  • 1 day ago
  • 1 min read

United States v. FMC Corp., 84 S.Ct. 4 (decided August 9, 1963): Goldberg says he has no jurisdiction to stay a merger which allegedly violated the Clayton Act.  The U.S. sued in the District Court which denied its motion for a stay, and appealed to Circuit Court, which held that it had no jurisdiction.  At issue was the “Expediting Act”, 15 U.S.C. §29, under which final judgments in antitrust cases brought by the U.S. can only be appealed directly to the Supreme Court, which had been construed to mean there can be no appeal (to any court) of nonfinal orders in such suits.  Goldberg notes split in the Circuits (the Third disagreeing with the others) and goes along with the majority view.  (As Circuit Justice he didn’t have the power to resolve the split; the Court eventually resolved it by agreeing with Goldberg, Tidewater Oil v. U.S., 1972, though the statute was later changed.)  Also at issue was the “all writs” statute, 28 U.S.C. §1651(a), which codifies the common law view that an appellate court has the power to order injunctions (and any other relief) in aid of its appellate jurisdiction.  Goldberg holds that the Expediting Act, being specific to this situation, applies.

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Today in Supreme Court History: August 11

Fowler v. Adams, 400 U.S. 1205 (decided August 11, 1970): Black allows Florida candidate for U.S. House to be on ballot even though he refused to pay the $2,125 statutory fee on the grounds that a sta

 
 
 
Today in Supreme Court History: August 10

Bowen v. Kendrick, 483 U.S. 1304 (decided August 10, 1987): Rehnquist notes that Court always puts down for direct appeal a case where district judge has declared an Act of Congress unconstitutional.

 
 
 
Today in Supreme Court History: August 8

Public Service Board of State of Vermont v. United States, 87 S.Ct. 3 (decided August 8, 1966): Harlan (II) denies stay of ICC order granting motion by Boston & Maine R.R. to discontinue on economic g

 
 
 

Comments


Thanks for submitting!

bottom of page