top of page
Search

Today in Supreme Court History: December 5

  • Writer: captcrisis
    captcrisis
  • 2 hours ago
  • 1 min read

Lopez v. Gonzalez, 549 U.S. 47 (decided December 5, 2006): felony under state law which is only a misdemeanor under federal law is not “a felony punishable under the Controlled Substances Act” (18 U.S.C. §924(c)(2)) (here, abetting possession of cocaine), so deportation is only discretionary


Things Remembered, Inc. v. Petrarca, 516 U.S. 124 (decided December 5, 1995): order remanding after removal is generally not appealable (once it’s out of federal court, it’s gone) (wrinkle here was that remand was to bankruptcy court, not state court, but bankruptcy court had no choice but to remand further to state court)


Pavelic & LeFlore v. Marvel Entertainment, 493 U.S. 120 (decided December 5, 1989): Rule 11 sanctions for frivolous pleading are awarded against the attorney who signed it, not his law firm (Scalia cites text of Rule; in dissent Marshall emphasizes trial judge’s right to control his courtroom, and that trial judge penalized both attorney and firm) (for an extreme example of Rule 11 “satellite litigation” during those mean years, check out Cooter & Gell v. Hartmax, 1990) (in 1996 my adversary threatened me with a Rule 11 motion for proposing to ask the judge for permission to move for summary judgment)

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Today in Supreme Court History: December 6

Palko v. Connecticut , 302 U.S. 319 (decided December 6, 1937): Fifth Amendment’s prohibition of double jeopardy did not apply to the states (upholding Connecticut statute allowing prosecution to appe

 
 
 
Today in Supreme Court History: December 4

New Jersey v. City of New York , 290 U.S. 237 (decided December 4, 1933): imposes penalties against NYC for not complying with earlier order prohibiting dumping garbage into ocean next to New Jersey A

 
 
 
Today in Supreme Court History: December 3

International Shoe v. Washington , 326 U.S. 310 (decided December 3, 1945): this case was (as my law professor put it) the “fountainhead” of personal jurisdiction law, finally ending the “presence in

 
 
 

Comments


Thanks for submitting!

bottom of page