top of page
Search

Today in Supreme Court History: December 9

  • Writer: captcrisis
    captcrisis
  • Dec 9, 2023
  • 1 min read

MacMath v. United States, 248 U.S. 151 (decided December 9, 1918): clerk employed as “acting U.S. weigher” at collection port not entitled to $2,500 statutory salary assigned to weighers (collection ports were notoriously a gold mine of booty, but I suppose not for lowly weighers, “acting” or otherwise)


Warger v. Shauers, 574 U.S. 40 (decided December 9, 2014): enforcing Fed. R. Evid. 606(b): juror cannot testify, and court cannot receive affidavit, as to statements during deliberations (here, as to bias) (exceptions: jury considered extraneous prejudicial information; was subjected to outside influence; or foreman made a mistake on the verdict form)


Virginia v. Maryland, 540 U.S. 56 (decided December 9, 2003): What to do about the Potomac River?  Charles I, as a favor to his friend Lord Baltimore, had set the Maryland border on the Virginia side of the river, instead of in the middle or along the thalweg; this decision overruled Charles and said Maryland couldn’t interfere with Virginia’s use of the river, in particular drawing water from it for drinking.  (The Mount Vernon Conference of 1785, a precursor to the Constitutional Convention, had already made the same decision, but it no longer had legal force.)

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Today in Supreme Court History: November 11

Boylan v. Hot Springs Ry. Co. , 132 U.S. 146 (decided November 11, 1889): passenger properly thrown off train when refusing to pay extra on return trip even though he had paid round trip fare, where t

 
 
 
Today in Supreme Court History: November 10

Ex Parte Crouch , 112 U.S. 178 (decided November 10, 1884): federal courts cannot via habeas vacate state court convictions except on jurisdictional grounds (gradually overruled, most specifically by

 
 
 
Today in Supreme Court History: November 9

Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc. , 510 U.S. 17 (decided November 9, 1993): Title VII claimant (“abusive work environment”) need not show that her psychological well-being was “seriously affected”; tot

 
 
 

Comments


Thanks for submitting!

bottom of page