top of page
Search

Today in Supreme Court History: February 20

  • Feb 20, 2025
  • 1 min read

Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (decided February 20, 1905): upholding state statute allowing local boards of health to require vaccinations (plaintiff contested Cambridge’s 1902 attempt to stem smallpox epidemic)


Timbs v. Indiana, 586 U.S. 146 (decided February 20, 2019): Excessive Fines Clause of Eighth Amendment is enforceable against states under Fourteenth Amendment; remands on issue of whether civil forfeiture statute violates Clause (here, vehicle seized worth four times the heroin defendant transported in it) (Indiana Supreme Court later held the statute unconstitutional, 169 N.E.3d 361)


Gunn v. Minton, 568 U.S. 251 (decided February 20, 2013): federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction of patent cases but not legal malpractice claim alleging mishandling of patent case


United States v. Euge, 444 U.S. 707 (decided February 20, 1980): IRS doesn’t need a court order to make you go to their office to write a handwriting sample


Curtis v. Loether, 415 U.S. 189 (decided February 20, 1974): housing discrimination action brought under Civil Rights Law of 1968 carries right to a jury trial, even though it didn’t exist in 1791 when the Seventh Amendment was adopted and even though it allows injunctive relief (an “equitable” remedy; the 7A applies on its face only to actions “at law”)

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Today in Supreme Court History: June 1

Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510 (decided June 1, 1925): striking down Oregon statute requiring all children to go to public school as infringing liberty right of parents to decide how to ed

 
 
 
Today in Supreme Court History: May 31

Maul v. United States, 274 U.S. 501 (decided May 31, 1927): vessel without proper registration properly seized by Coast Guard 34 miles offshore because statute restricting jurisdiction to 4 leagues (a

 
 
 
Today in Supreme Court History: May 30

BNSF Ry. Co. v. Tyrrell, 581 U.S. 402 (decided May 30, 2017): railroad could be sued in state where it was neither based nor incorporated nor where accident happened (IOW, under general “doing busines

 
 
 

Comments


Thanks for submitting!

bottom of page