top of page
Search

Today in Supreme Court History: February 4

Feb 5, 2024
1 min read

Dice v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown R.R. Co., 342 U.S. 359 (decided February 4, 1952): release of personal injury defendant sued under Federal Employers’ Liability Act is determined by federal, not state, law and issue of whether release was obtained by fraud is to be tried by a jury


Martino v. Michigan Window Cleaning Co., 327 U.S. 173 (decided February 4, 1946): can sue for inadequate overtime under Fair Labor Standards Act even though union contract allowed it (superseded by statute, see 186 Wash. 2d 357)


Canizio v. People, 327 U.S. 82 (decided February 4, 1946): 19-year-old denied right to counsel after arrest could not show prejudice because represented by counsel at pleading stage and at trial (presumably overruled by later Court decisions)


Estep v. United States, 327 U.S. 114 (decided February 4, 1946): defendants prosecuted for refusing induction into armed services; Congress can provide that findings of local draft boards are final and cannot be judicially reviewed but court can review argument that board acted outside jurisdiction


Jurney v. MacCracken, 294 U.S. 125 (decided February 4, 1935): Congress can punish for contempt even though subpoenaed records had been destroyed, making subpoena moot (witness was suspected of corruption in awarding air mail contracts and Congress had him imprisoned for ten days)

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Today in Supreme Court History: October 14

McConnell v. Rhay, 393 U.S. 2 (decided October 14, 1968): Court holds that its rule of Mempa v. Rhay, 1967 -- the right to counsel in revocation of probation and deferred sentencing proceedings, at le

 
 
 
Today in Supreme Court History: October 13

Moore v. Terminal Railroad Ass’n of St. Louis, 358 U.S. 31 (decided October 13, 1958): Court, without opinion, reverses Missouri Supreme Court and upholds jury verdict that railroad company had share

 
 
 
Today in Supreme Court History: October 12

United States v. Morrison, 429 U.S. 1 (decided October 12, 1976): After conviction based on marijuana found in car, the Circuit Court (in another case) created an exclusionary rule which was retrospe

 
 
 

Comments


Thanks for submitting!

bottom of page