top of page
Search

Today in Supreme Court History: January 19

  • Writer: captcrisis
    captcrisis
  • 15 hours ago
  • 1 min read

Patsone v. Pennsylvania, 232 U.S. 138 (decided January 19, 1914): state can prohibit foreign born non-citizens from killing wild game except in defense of person or property (this case has never been overruled)


NASA v. Nelson, 562 U.S. 134 (decided January 19, 2011): upholding NASA regulation requiring even long-term employees to submit to background checks and answer questions about illegal drug use (“if there is a right to private information, it is not violated here”)


United States v. Mueller, 113 U.S. 153 (decided January 19, 1885): builder of new customs house in Chicago entitled to delay costs incurred due to government dithering as to building design


Oyama v. California, 332 U.S. 633 (decided January 19, 1948): leaves in place California statute which in effect prohibited those of Japanese ancestry from owning land, so father’s gift to son invalidated and land went to the state (majority opinion relies on father’s failure to make some formal filings, but c’mon . . .) (statute soon struck down by California Supreme Court, Sei Fujii v. State, 1952)


Presley v. Georgia, 558 U.S. 209 (decided January 19, 2010): Sixth Amendment right to public trial includes access to jury selection

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Today in Supreme Court History: January 18

Mistretta v. United States , 488 U.S. 361 (decided January 18, 1989): The Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 created the Sentencing Commission (appointed by the President w/Senate approval, three of seven

 
 
 
Today in Supreme Court History: January 17

Jimmy Swaggart Ministries v. Board of Equalization of California , 493 U.S. 378 (decided January 17, 1990): generally applicable sales and use tax (i.e., goods, property) does not violate Free Exercis

 
 
 
Today in Supreme Court History: January 16

Garrity v. New Jersey , 385 U.S. 493 (decided January 16, 1967): police officers being questioned in connection with investigation of traffic ticket fixing enjoyed Fifth Amendment privilege against se

 
 
 

1 Comment


Syd Henderson
12 hours ago

Do you think Patsone should be overruled? It doesn't seem to apply to naturalized citizens, but to legal and illegal aliens, and states do have a stake in protecting their wildlife.

Like

Thanks for submitting!

bottom of page