top of page
Search

Today in Supreme Court History: July 16

  • Writer: captcrisis
    captcrisis
  • Jul 16, 2023
  • 1 min read

Travia v. Lomenzo, 86 S.Ct. 7 (decided July 16, 1965): In this order by Harlan refusing a stay of a District Court decision, we see 1) that a federal trial court order, even when up for appeal, is “final and binding” on a state’s highest court; 2) how pissed off he was by the Supreme Court’s earlier decision in this case, which he dissented from; 3) how he is bound by the Court’s earlier decision regarding a similar application (381 U.S. 431); and 4) how if the Court had explained its reasoning “in a sensitive and not heavy-handed manner” the state court would have felt free to defer to the District Court. Here, the question was whether state senate and assembly elections could be held in the midst of litigation as to whether a recent reapportionment violated Equal Protection. The District Court ordered it to go forward; the state court had ordered it stayed. The matter was settled the next year, in time for the 1966 elections, when the New York court approved reapportionment recommendations of a judicial commission (Orans v. Rockefeller, 1966)

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Today in Supreme Court History: November 10

Ex Parte Crouch , 112 U.S. 178 (decided November 10, 1884): federal courts cannot via habeas vacate state court convictions except on jurisdictional grounds (gradually overruled, most specifically by

 
 
 
Today in Supreme Court History: November 9

Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc. , 510 U.S. 17 (decided November 9, 1993): Title VII claimant (“abusive work environment”) need not show that her psychological well-being was “seriously affected”; tot

 
 
 
Today in Supreme Court History: November 8

Greene v. Fisher , 565 U.S. 34 (decided November 8, 2011): “clearly established federal law” required for habeas does not include law established by Court in decision announced after state appeals on

 
 
 

Comments


Thanks for submitting!

bottom of page