top of page
Search

Today in Supreme Court History: July 9

  • Writer: captcrisis
    captcrisis
  • Jul 9, 2023
  • 1 min read

McGirt v. Oklahoma, 591 U.S. --- (decided July 9, 2020): Oklahoma had no jurisdiction to try Native American because alleged crime occurred on what was still technically a reservation despite long history of broken promises and disruption of borders; case can only be tried in federal court under the Major Crimes Act (the decision is a good example of Gorsuch’s casual writing style)


Trump v. Vance, 591 U.S. --- (decided July 9, 2020): rejecting Trump’s attempt to block grand jury subpoena on his accountants; Article II and Supremacy Clause not violated by state criminal process on a sitting President


Trump v. Mazars USA, 591 U.S. --- (decided July 9, 2020): Trump contested Congressional subpoenas into his financial affairs for purpose of determining money laundering and extent of foreign influence; no executive privilege asserted, but Congress had never subpoenaed Presidential records before and Court remanded for consideration of separation of powers concerns (Thomas in dissent holds that Congress can never subpoena private papers from anyone, let alone the President, except as part of an impeachment process) (with Trump no longer President, D.C. Circuit ruled that the subpoenas had to be responded to in part, 39 F.4th 774, 2022)

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Today in Supreme Court History: November 10

Ex Parte Crouch , 112 U.S. 178 (decided November 10, 1884): federal courts cannot via habeas vacate state court convictions except on jurisdictional grounds (gradually overruled, most specifically by

 
 
 
Today in Supreme Court History: November 9

Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc. , 510 U.S. 17 (decided November 9, 1993): Title VII claimant (“abusive work environment”) need not show that her psychological well-being was “seriously affected”; tot

 
 
 
Today in Supreme Court History: November 8

Greene v. Fisher , 565 U.S. 34 (decided November 8, 2011): “clearly established federal law” required for habeas does not include law established by Court in decision announced after state appeals on

 
 
 

Comments


Thanks for submitting!

bottom of page