top of page
Search

Today in Supreme Court History: July 9

Jul 10, 2025
1 min read

McGirt v. Oklahoma, 591 U.S. 894 (decided July 9, 2020): Oklahoma had no jurisdiction to try Native American because alleged crime occurred on what was still technically a reservation despite long history of broken promises and disruption of borders; case can only be tried in federal court under the Major Crimes Act (the decision is a good example of Gorsuch’s casual writing style)


Trump v. Vance, 591 U.S. 786 (decided July 9, 2020): rejecting Trump’s attempt to block grand jury subpoena on his accountants; Article II and Supremacy Clause not violated by state criminal process on a sitting President


Trump v. Mazars USA, 591 U.S. 848 (decided July 9, 2020): Trump contested Congressional subpoenas into his financial affairs for purpose of determining money laundering and extent of foreign influence; no executive privilege asserted, but Congress had never subpoenaed Presidential records before and Court remanded for consideration of separation of powers concerns (Thomas in dissent holds that Congress can never subpoena private papers from anyone, let alone the President, except as part of an impeachment process) (with Trump no longer President, D.C. Circuit ruled that the subpoenas had to be responded to in part, 39 F.4th 774, 2022)

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Today in Supreme Court History: September 9

McGee v. Alaska, 104 S.Ct. 16 (decided September 9, 1983): Rehnquist denies prisoner’s request to be released on bail even though the prosecuting authority (State of Alaska) agreed; this was a federal

 
 
 
Today in Supreme Court History: September 8

Tuscarora Nation of Indians v. Power Authority of the State of New York, 79 S.Ct. 4 (decided September 8, 1958): Harlan partially affirms and partially reverses Second Circuit’s stay of condemnation o

 
 
 
Today in Supreme Court History: September 7

Uhler v. AFL-CIO, 105 S.Ct. 5 (decided September 7, 1984): Rehnquist says federal courts have no jurisdiction to stay California Supreme Court’s striking from the ballot a referendum requiring the leg

 
 
 

Comments


Thanks for submitting!

bottom of page