top of page
Search

Today in Supreme Court History: November 13

Nov 13, 2023
1 min read

United States v. Bormes, 568 U.S. 6 (decided November 13, 2021): dismissing lawyers’ class action alleging Fair Credit Reporting Act violation of privacy (federal filing fee receipts display last four digits and expiration date of lawyer’s credit card) because sovereign immunity not waived


Ayers v. Belmontes, 549 U.S. 7 (decided November 13, 2006): no error in judge not specifically instructing jury to consider future mitigating circumstances in sentencing (here, that defendant would lead a constructive life if incarcerated as opposed to executed), where evidence and argument was presented by defense counsel; death sentence reinstated (the defendant, who during a burglary unexpectedly encountered the 19-year-old victim and struck her head 15 to 20 times with a dumbbell, went up to the Court again on an ineffective assistance of counsel argument in 2009; eventually died on death row of natural causes in 2017) (so did those extra years end up being “constructive”?)


In re Amendments to Rules 1 and 10, 108 U.S. 1 (decided November 13, 1882): Waite amends Court rules as to costs for a copy of the record; he gifts us with a history of the clerk’s practices under the old rule (this boring disquisition suited Waite’s literary talents; as Frankfurter pointed out, “the stuff of the artist was not in him”)

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Today in Supreme Court History: October 14

McConnell v. Rhay, 393 U.S. 2 (decided October 14, 1968): Court holds that its rule of Mempa v. Rhay, 1967 -- the right to counsel in revocation of probation and deferred sentencing proceedings, at le

 
 
 
Today in Supreme Court History: October 13

Moore v. Terminal Railroad Ass’n of St. Louis, 358 U.S. 31 (decided October 13, 1958): Court, without opinion, reverses Missouri Supreme Court and upholds jury verdict that railroad company had share

 
 
 
Today in Supreme Court History: October 12

United States v. Morrison, 429 U.S. 1 (decided October 12, 1976): After conviction based on marijuana found in car, the Circuit Court (in another case) created an exclusionary rule which was retrospe

 
 
 

Comments


Thanks for submitting!

bottom of page