top of page
Search

Today in Supreme Court History: November 19

  • Writer: captcrisis
    captcrisis
  • 2 days ago
  • 1 min read

Goudy v. Meath, 203 U.S. 146 (decided November 19, 1906): Congress may exempt land held by Native Americans from taxation before they sell it but didn’t do so here; Congress had declared in 1887 that plaintiff’s tribe were now citizens so he had to pay taxes from that point forward


United States v. Cambridge Loan & Building Co., 278 U.S. 55 (decided November 19, 1928): government was estopped from collecting back taxes even though taxpayer “building and loan association” was making too much money on the outside to qualify for exemption designed for nonprofits


Francisco v. Gathright, 419 U.S. 59 (decided November 19, 1974): habeas petitioner didn’t have to resubmit to state court his claim that the state statute he had been arrested under was unconstitutional; his state appeals had been exhausted but the state supreme court then issued a decision in another case agreeing that the statute was unconstitutional (Sharp v. Commonwealth, 1972, where the Virginia Supreme Court held that intent to distribute drugs cannot be inferred solely from the quantity possessed) (I think it can very well be inferred, unless the possessor was the all-consuming Hunter S. Thompson)

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Today in Supreme Court History: November 20

Osborne v. County of Adams , 106 U.S. 181 (decided November 20, 1882): a steam grist mill is not an “internal improvement” under state statute authorizing county to issue bonds for construction; statu

 
 
 
Today in Supreme Court History: November 18

Ohio v. Robinette , 519 U.S. 33 (decided November 18, 1996): search of car was truly consensual even though police officer didn’t first tell driver he was “free to go” (police asked to search, driver

 
 
 
Today in Supreme Court History: November 17

Dennis v. Sparks , 449 U.S. 24 (decided November 17, 1980): private parties who allegedly corruptly conspired with judge to deny oil lease in violation of Due Process can still be sued under §1983 eve

 
 
 

Comments


Thanks for submitting!

bottom of page