top of page
Search

Today in Supreme Court History: November 4

Nov 4, 2025
1 min read

District of Columbia v. Eslin, 183 U.S. 62 (decided November 4, 1901): judgment by contractor against the District of Columbia’s Board of Public Works is uncollectable because filed in court which no longer had jurisdiction, even though judgment and notice of appeal were filed before statute eliminating jurisdiction was enacted (repeal statute had explicitly vacated all existing proceedings) (sounds to me like the statute violated Due Process)


Stanton v. Sims, 571 U.S. 3 (decided November 4, 2013): police officer enjoyed qualified immunity from §1983 suit brought by woman whose front gate was kicked down while he was in warrantless “hot pursuit” of suspect (this kind of thing actually happened to a friend of mine, in the early 1990’s; my research skills, rudimentary at that point, led me to believe that her case fell within a “de minimus” exception, even though to her that ruined front door was pretty expensive)


INS v. Orlando Ventura, 537 U.S. 12 (decided November 4, 2002): Circuit Court can’t decide fact issues (here, Government’s “changed conditions” argument that Guatemala was now safer and political asylum no longer merited); should have remanded back to Board of Immigration Appeals

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Today in Supreme Court History: October 12

United States v. Morrison, 429 U.S. 1 (decided October 12, 1976): After conviction based on marijuana found in car, the Circuit Court (in another case) created an exclusionary rule which was retrospe

 
 
 
Today in Supreme Court History: October 11

Arlington County Board v. Richards, 434 U.S. 5 (decided October 11, 1977): town can restrict on-street parking to residents and their guests; “rational basis” survives Equal Protection attack (at firs

 
 
 
Today in Supreme Court History: October 10

Lucy v. Adams, 350 U.S. 1 (decided October 10, 1955): Court reinstates injunction, meaning University of Alabama can’t deny two black students admission; District Court had found that sole basis for d

 
 
 

Comments


Thanks for submitting!

bottom of page