top of page
Search

Today in Supreme Court History: October 18

Oct 18, 2025
1 min read

Rivas-Villegas v. Cortesluna, 595 U.S. 1 (decided October 18, 2021): plaintiff sued under §1983 for excessive force; Court held that police officer who put knee in his back after he was already on the ground was entitled to qualified immunity (plaintiff had threatened and cornered wife and children in house, came out at command of police with knife in his pocket, and officer briefly placed his knee on plaintiff’s back when handcuffing him and removing his knife); unanimous per curiam decision (this lawsuit was a new definition of “chutzpah”)


Bergere v. United States, 168 U.S. 66 (decided October 18, 1897): this decision on grants of land under a contested Will in the New Mexico territory presents a riot of law school issues, e.g., whether cattle grazing amounts to adverse possession, whether a torn document is an enforceable contract, to what extent the Court will apply the law of Mexico and Spain that were in effect at the time and place in question, whether delivery of land by alcalde (mayor) binds the governor, and more


James v. Louisiana, 382 U.S. 36 (decided October 18, 1965): search of drug arrestee’s home two blocks from where he was arrested was not a “search incident to arrest” and therefore evidence seized there was inadmissible

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Today in Supreme Court History: October 16

Charlotte Harbor & N. Ry. Co. v. Welles, 260 U.S. 8 (decided October 16, 1922): Florida Legislature can ratify county’s ultra vires (this means exceeding authority) creation of new bridge district whi

 
 
 
Today in Supreme Court History: October 15

Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 3 (decided October 15, 1883): strikes down federal statute prohibiting racial discrimination in public accommodations; Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments apply only to g

 
 
 
Today in Supreme Court History: October 14

McConnell v. Rhay, 393 U.S. 2 (decided October 14, 1968): Court holds that its rule of Mempa v. Rhay, 1967 -- the right to counsel in revocation of probation and deferred sentencing proceedings, at le

 
 
 

Comments


Thanks for submitting!

bottom of page