top of page
Search

Today in Supreme Court History: September 18

  • Writer: captcrisis
    captcrisis
  • Sep 17, 2025
  • 1 min read

Matter of Disbarment of Donald D. Nash, 473 U.S. 931 (decided September 18, 1985).  Convicted of Class A sodomy, later applied for reinstatement; the Oregon decision denying it graphically describes his history of pedophilia, 855 P.2d 1112 (1993).  He had had sex with the 6-year-old daughter of a client. The psychiatrist at the reinstatement hearing noted that Mr. Nash was married to a woman 20 years younger who was “unlikely to be at his maturity level”.  The Dr. recommended that he return to practice but be prohibited from taking on clients with young daughters.  Good God! -- thankfully the court did not buy it.  He is still disbarred.


Matter of Disbarment of John Cody, 473 U.S. 930 (decided September 18, 1985):  This man, John Donald Cody, has such an extensive history that he is on Wikipedia.  After being caught stealing client funds, he disappeared, stole another’s identity, and incorporated a charity supposedly for Navy veterans (actually it was a charity for himself).  He got onto the VA’s referral list and was photographed with George W. Bush, John Boehner, John McCain, Rudy Giuliani (no surprise there) and Karl Rove.  They finally caught him in 2012 and he’s in prison for life.

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Today in Supreme Court History: February 4

Dice v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown R.R. Co. , 342 U.S. 359 (decided February 4, 1952): release of personal injury defendant sued under Federal Employers’ Liability Act is determined by federal, not st

 
 
 
Today in Supreme Court History: February 3

Germany v. Philipp , 592 U.S. 169 (decided February 3, 2021): Foreign Sovereignty Immunities Act barred suit in U.S. courts by Holocaust survivors to recover value of property they were forced to sell

 
 
 
Today in Supreme Court History: February 2

Dartmouth College v. Woodward , 17 U.S. 518 (decided February 2, 1819): state attempt to change existing charter of college to turn it into a public institution violated Contracts Clause; corporate en

 
 
 

Comments


Thanks for submitting!

bottom of page