top of page
Search

Today in Supreme Court History: September 29

Sep 28
1 min read

Smith v. Richey, 89 S.Ct. 54 (decided September 29, 1968): Challenge to callup to active duty as violating the Ready Reserve Act, for which Douglas notes there are “substantial and unresolved questions”.  Smith was to be sent the next day “to the Asian theater”; Douglas “hesitates to act” but since the Ninth Circuit had denied a stay, Douglas grants it, keeping the soldier at Hamilton Air Force Base.  (Not known what happened later, but Ready Reserve Act, a/k/a Military Selective Service Act, 50 U.S.C. §451, amended in 1967 to narrow the conscientious objector exception, has always been held to be Constitutional.)


Chamber of Commerce of U.S. v. Legal Aid Society of Alameda County, 423 U.S. 1309 (decided September 29, 1975):  The last decision by the stroke-felled Douglas, who embarrassed himself on the bench two weeks previous by being “out of it” (see Sept. 11) but seemed on the ball for this one.  Here he refuses to stay a protective order, noting that disclosure of demographic information on federal contractors collected by the EEOC is prohibited by statute and cannot be disclosed by another agency that ended up with the information.


Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1 (decided September 29, 1958): full Court refuses to stay Little Rock desegregation order; Governor and state legislature are bound by decisions of District Court

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Today in Supreme Court History: October 16

Charlotte Harbor & N. Ry. Co. v. Welles, 260 U.S. 8 (decided October 16, 1922): Florida Legislature can ratify county’s ultra vires (this means exceeding authority) creation of new bridge district whi

 
 
 
Today in Supreme Court History: October 15

Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 3 (decided October 15, 1883): strikes down federal statute prohibiting racial discrimination in public accommodations; Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments apply only to g

 
 
 
Today in Supreme Court History: October 14

McConnell v. Rhay, 393 U.S. 2 (decided October 14, 1968): Court holds that its rule of Mempa v. Rhay, 1967 -- the right to counsel in revocation of probation and deferred sentencing proceedings, at le

 
 
 

Comments


Thanks for submitting!

bottom of page