top of page
Search

Today in Supreme Court History: September 6

Sep 6, 2025
1 min read

Shamburger v. Cockrell, 536 U.S. 986 (decided September 6, 2002): Denies stay of execution and also denies cert. Stevens and Ginsburg would grant the stay (probably because both had come to believe that the death penalty, as practiced, is always a violation of Due Process).  Shamberger was executed by lethal injection five days later.  A student at Texas A & M, he had shot another A & M student during an off-campus burglary.  This was one of many burglaries he had committed.  The gun was a 9mm pistol he had bought with a credit card he had already stolen from the victim (whom he had been stalking).  He tied the victim up and gagged her with duct tape, and then shot her when he heard her roommate coming home.  He confessed to the crime within hours after the attack and apologized to the family over and over, including on the day of execution.  On appeal he had contested only the sentence (death as opposed to life imprisonment).


Sridej v. Blinken, 2024 WL 410047 (decided September 6, 2024): Kagan leaves in place extradition from Nevada to Thailand; extradition treaty still in force and fraud alleged would be a crime in Nevada also (allegedly stole $4 million in electronics from employer in Thailand; courts had earlier rejected her argument that she would be subject to torture there)

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Today in Supreme Court History: October 14

McConnell v. Rhay, 393 U.S. 2 (decided October 14, 1968): Court holds that its rule of Mempa v. Rhay, 1967 -- the right to counsel in revocation of probation and deferred sentencing proceedings, at le

 
 
 
Today in Supreme Court History: October 13

Moore v. Terminal Railroad Ass’n of St. Louis, 358 U.S. 31 (decided October 13, 1958): Court, without opinion, reverses Missouri Supreme Court and upholds jury verdict that railroad company had share

 
 
 
Today in Supreme Court History: October 12

United States v. Morrison, 429 U.S. 1 (decided October 12, 1976): After conviction based on marijuana found in car, the Circuit Court (in another case) created an exclusionary rule which was retrospe

 
 
 

Comments


Thanks for submitting!

bottom of page